Industrial Companies Controlled by Billionaire Jim Ratcliffe Obtained Up to £70m in UK Government Support In the Last Four-Year Period
Before this week's £50m government bailout for its Grangemouth facility, chemical companies controlled by billionaire Jim Ratcliffe had already been granted as much as £70m in UK state aid during the previous four-year period.
Recent Revelations and Financial Support
Based on official data released this week, public funding to the Ineos group in the last year alone was between £16m and £38m. Since August 2022, the company has received a total of £28m and £70m.
Authorities intervened on Tuesday to provide Ineos with £50m to support its Grangemouth operations, concerned that otherwise the UK would lose its sole facility producing ethylene—a vital feedstock for plastics. Officials additionally supported a £75m loan guarantee, while Ineos committed to invest £30m of its private capital.
Refinery Shutdown and Broader Context
This support comes after Ineos shut down the neighbouring oil refinery in late 2024, costing 400 jobs—a move described as a significant setback to the area and a political problem for the government.
Ratcliffe, who is worth $14.5bn, reportedly asked for government help in October. The request comes at a time when the wide-ranging Ineos group, under the control of the 73-year-old, has been under considerable economic strain, in part due to sharply increased energy costs in the wake of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
In a sign of growing unease over its ability to manage debt, Fitch Ratings downgraded Ineos's debt rating in September. Ratcliffe has also had to commit significant funds into his off-road vehicle venture and efforts to revitalise the football club, in which he holds a minority stake.
Form of Support and Company Statements
The majority of the previous state aid came in the form of tax breaks in return for “voluntary agreements to reduce energy use and carbon dioxide emissions.” Figures for these relief schemes for Ineos's plants in Grangemouth and Hull are reported as ranges rather than exact amounts.
An Ineos spokesperson stated the aid did not represent “special treatment” for the company, but was “awarded against strict criteria, and open to any UK business that meets the requirements.”
While Ratcliffe thanked the government for the £50m support in an announcement, Ineos separately issued more critical comments. In these, the billionaire launched a broadside against government policy, specifically carbon taxes paid by industrial users.
“The answer is NOT decarbonisation by deindustrialisation,” Ratcliffe wrote. “Without a strong manufacturing base, the economy will continue to decline. Soaring power prices and burdensome carbon levies are driving industry out of the UK at an unsustainable pace.”
In further comments, Ratcliffe described carbon taxes as “the most idiotic tax in the world,” arguing they put UK plants at a competitive disadvantage against international competitors. It is noted that most chemicals and plastics are excluded from the UK's planned carbon import tax.
Future Sustainability Claims
The Ineos spokesperson further stated: “Ineos has invested over £400m at Grangemouth in the last five years to keep it as one of the most efficient chemical plants in Europe and to protect skilled jobs. The UK chemicals sector has had a very difficult year, yet society depends on this industry every day. Should we fail to manufacture these critical products in the UK, they are brought in from overseas, often from more polluting operations abroad.”
A senior Ineos executive, head of sustainability for the company's Olefins & Polymers division, said the Grangemouth money would be used to improve energy efficiency, cut carbon emissions, and boost overall performance.
He noted the site, which uses an processing unit utilising North Sea gas and US-sourced liquefied petroleum gas, had been under “extreme pressure” from rocketing energy costs and the UK's carbon taxes.
It has also been reported that Ineos has previously received substantial tax breaks from the EU, worth hundreds of millions of euros—notably while Ratcliffe was a prominent backer of the campaign for the UK to exit the European Union.